Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Richard Gage PWNS Mark Roberts; Must see.
Topic Started: Jul 5 2008, 01:15 PM (3,628 Views)
look-up
Member Avatar

MM
 
Personally I welcome honest skeptics because they open my eyes to new information and often provide fresh perspectives on
9/11.


Here, here!

shh... what they don't know is that they don't debunk our claims, they only find mistakes in the way we present them and word them, thus causing us to revise statements so that the yare more accurate, and not so easy to debunk by playing semantics games.

Think of the old "Al-qaeda doesn't exist" mantra that some people used.

Skeptics helped us learn more about the hijackers. Gave us sources. Lots of good stuff.

Then, we were able to show how the line between islamic terror and western intelligence agencies is very thin indeed, and often times these groups work together to overthrow governments.

on 9/11, the Constitution was overthrown. it worked again.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Flippy

This thread can be used to present the way the "skeptics" constantly prop up straw man arguments concerning everything we say.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create a free forum in seconds.
Learn More · Sign-up Now
« Previous Topic · The Lounge · Next Topic »
Add Reply